5 factors affecting lls

Please download to get full document.

View again

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
 10
 
  1. 5 Factors Affecting LLS { By Marco Arlden A149911 TESL UKM, Bangi 2.  Motivation  Learning Styles  Experiences in Studying  Proficiency Level  Gender…
Related documents
Share
Transcript
  • 1. 5 Factors Affecting LLS { By Marco Arlden A149911 TESL UKM, Bangi
  • 2.  Motivation  Learning Styles  Experiences in Studying  Proficiency Level  Gender The 5 Factors
  • 3.  More motivated learners used more learning strategies, and more frequently (McIntyre & Noels 1996)  Strategy use was affected by motivational level instead of a particular motivational orientation (instrumental or integrative) (MacLeod 2002)  One of the major predictors of the use of LLS by Persian learners (Rahimi et al. 2008) Motivation
  • 4.  Extroverts show a strong preference for social strategies, introverts use metacognitive strategies more frequently (Ehrman & Oxford 1990)  Learners who favour group study tend to use social and interactive strategies (Rossi-Le 1995)  There were qualitatively significant difference between Iranian EFL learners’ perceptual learning style preferences and LLS (Alireza & Abdullah 2010) Learning Style
  • 5.  Study showed that students who had been in Australia for a longer period of time (3 or less years and 4 or more) obtained significantly higher mean scores for cognitive strategies and for memory strategies ( Purdie and Oliver’s 1999)  Studying abroad contributed to language learning strategy choices (Opper, Teichler & Carlson 1990) Experiences in Studying
  • 6.  Differing levels of proficiency gave rise to differing frequencies of strategy use - intermediate students used metacognitive strategies more than beginners, while the latter used more translation strategies (O’Malley et al. 1985)  Low-proficiency students outperformed the high-proficiency ones in their use of compensation strategies (Chen 2002) Proficiency Level
  • 7.  Cognitive and metacognitive strategies show correlations with high language proficiency levels (Peacock & Ho 2003)  Linear correlations between strategy use and proficiency level were found among Korean EFL learners and University students in Hong Kong respectively ( Park 1997; Peacock and Ho’s 2003) Proficiency Level
  • 8.  Females used social and metacognitive strategies most, memory the least; Males used Metacognitive and Compensation most, Affective least (Hong-Nam & Leavell 2006)  Males were more likely to use a variety of learning strategies than females in a study of adult Vietnamese refugees (Tran 1998)  No significant effect on certain strategies like Memory, Metacognitive and Affective unless from different majors (Ma 1999) Gender
  • 9. Thank You
  • Related Search
    We Need Your Support
    Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

    Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

    No, Thanks